Alternative measure to personal constraint guaranteeing the principle of the best interest of the child.

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v7i2.2188

Keywords:

Child welfare, legal system, human rights, child welfare, human rights. (UNESCO Thesaurus).

Abstract

The general objective of this research was to legally analyze the alternative measure to personal constraint, guaranteeing the principle of the best interest of the child. The research development was carried out from a quantitative approach, through the search, collection and critical analysis of documents, bibliographic references and studies or research projects, from the interpretation of the subject under study, in this sense: many of the objects with which legal science works can be approached from a theoretical, empirical dimension. Supported, from a bibliographic design of documentary type, whose inquiry from the critical reflection, considering laws, norms, agreements, international treaties, theses, which led to obtaining relevant information and conclusions. It is concluded that, in the cases of the UNIANDES Free Legal Clinic, it was noted that in most of them the use of personal constraint, either total or partial, does not ensure compliance with the obligation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asamblea Nacional Constituyente de la República del Ecuador, (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador. [ Montecristi. Registro Oficial 449 de 20-oct-2008. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/sia

Asamblea Nacional de la República del Ecuador. (2015). Código Orgánico General de Procesos. [General Organic Code of Processes]. 2 -- Suplemento -- Registro Ofi cial Nº 506 -- Viernes 22 de mayo de 2015.Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/x7xyt

Barcos Arias, I. (2015). Medida alternativa al apremio personal en alimentantes de bajos recursos económicos. [Alternative to personal urged obligors low in economic resources measure]. UNIANDES EPISTEME: Revista de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación,2 (2);138-143.Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/2zcgb

Congreso Nacional (2003). Código de la Niñez y Adolescencia. [Code of Childhood and Adolescents]. publicado por Ley No. 100. en Registro Oficial 737 de 3 de enero del 2003. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/dtrec

Corte Constitucional del Ecuador (2015). Sentencia No. 064-15-SEP-CC.[ Ruling No. 064-15-SEP-CC]. Caso N.° 0331-12-EP. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/2q8tc

Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos (2002). Opinión Consultiva. [Opinión Consultiva]. OC-17/2002 de 28 de agosto de 2002. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/sdqfr

García-Lozano, Soledad. (2016). El interés superior del niño. [ The best interest of the child]. Anuario mexicano de derecho internacional, 16, 131-157., Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/6f37s

Paredes Henríquez, M. (2021). Análisis del apremio personal para el alimentante que deba pensiones alimenticias y la vulneración del derecho. [ Análisis del apremio personal para el alimentante que deba pensiones alimenticias y la vulneración del derecho]. Tesis de Maestría. Universidad Laica Vicente Rocafuerte de Guayaquil. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/n0w3q

Quezada Noboa, P. (2018). Custodia Compartida y el Derecho del cuidado de los hijos. [Shared Custody and Child Care Law]. Edi PUCE. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Ecuador. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/0ncq7

Villabella, C. (2015). Los métodos en la investigación jurídica. Algunas precisiones. [Methods in legal research. Some clarifications] Instituto de Investigación Jurídica de la UNAM. Recuperado en http://biblio.juridicas.unam.mx

Published

2022-08-15

How to Cite

Mafla Sánchez, J. L., López-Bravo, M. V., Villarreal Hernández, C. C., & Chugá Quemac, R. E. (2022). Alternative measure to personal constraint guaranteeing the principle of the best interest of the child. IUSTITIA SOCIALIS, 7(2), 930–938. https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v7i2.2188

Issue

Section

De Investigación